In the rapidly evolving landscape of construction law, staying abreast of recent legal developments is essential for industry professionals. This 2024 overview is aimed to provide you with key court rulings and legislative changes that have significant implications for contractual practices and compliance in the construction industry. Understanding these issues is crucial for protecting your financial interests and ensuring the successful execution of your projects.

Navigating the Complexities of Payment Claims Under BIFA – Essential Insights from a Recent Queensland Court Ruling to Ensure Your Payment Claims Are Legally Compliant

A recent Queensland Court of Appeal decision serves as a crucial reminder of the importance of strict compliance with the statutory requirements for payment claims under the Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017 (BIFA). In MWB Everton Park Pty Ltd v Devcon Building Co Pty Ltd, the court ruled that Devcon’s payment claims failed to meet the necessary criteria, particularly in the identification of work, clarity of the claimed amount, and explicit request for payment. This ruling highlights how even seemingly minor errors or ambiguities in payment claims can result in significant legal and financial setbacks.

This case underscores the critical need for construction companies to ensure that their payment claims are detailed, clear, and consistent with BIFA’s requirements. By preparing each aspect of a payment claim and seeking professional advice when necessary, especially on large or complex projects, businesses can better protect themselves from the risks of payment disputes and ensure that they secure the payments to which they are entitled.

Learn more here

Queensland’s Trust Account Framework: The Latest Developments

Queensland’s construction industry is undergoing significant changes with the introduction of the trust account framework under the Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017 (BIFA). Understanding the requirements and recent amendments to this framework is crucial for ensuring compliance and protecting the financial health of your projects. The trust account framework comprises Project Trust Accounts (PTAs) and Retention Trust Accounts (RTAs), designed to safeguard progress payments and retention amounts. PTAs are required for eligible construction contracts and ensure transparent and secure handling of project payments, while RTAs hold retention amounts across multiple projects, reducing the administrative burden for contractors managing several contracts simultaneously.

The trust account framework is being rolled out in phases, with full implementation expected by 1 October 2025. This phased approach allows the industry time to adapt to the new requirements, including the mandatory establishment of PTAs and RTAs for contracts exceeding certain thresholds. Key obligations under BIFA include making payments into the PTA, establishing RTAs for withheld cash retentions, and reporting non-compliance to the Queensland Building and Construction Commission (QBCC). Recent amendments to BIFA, introduced by the 2024 legislation, simplify the trust account framework, reduce costs, and enhance protections for subcontractors. These changes include a streamlined definition of subcontractor beneficiaries, clarification on retention amounts including GST, and relaxed accounting and auditing requirements. Staying informed and adapting to these changes is essential for maintaining compliance and safeguarding your projects against potential legal and financial risks.

Learn more here

The Prevention Principle in Commercial Contracts for Construction Works

The prevention principle is a key concept in construction law, preventing one party from enforcing a breach of contract caused by their own prior breach. In essence, if a party’s actions delay the other party’s ability to complete their contractual obligations on time, the offending party cannot claim liquidated damages for that delay. This principle is often invoked as a defence against claims for liquidated damages, arguing that the plaintiff’s conduct prevented timely completion of the works. However, the right to rely on the prevention principle is not absolute; parties can exclude or modify its application through the terms of their construction contract. An effective extension of time regime can negate the need for the prevention principle by allowing the party exposed to liquidated damages to claim extensions for delays caused by the other party, thus avoiding penalties.

Nevertheless, the prevention principle can persist despite an extension of time clause, particularly where the contract gives the party entitled to claim liquidated damages, or their superintendent, discretion to grant extensions for delays they cause. This situation can create an implied obligation to consider extending time, even if the contract does not explicitly mandate it. The interpretation of such clauses depends on the contract’s overall construction and may require consideration of the surrounding circumstances, making it difficult to fully understand their implications without legal advice. For subcontractors, it is crucial to ensure that extension of time clauses are not only available but also practically exercisable, as inadequate provisions can inadvertently exclude the protection of the prevention principle, leading to significant financial detriment. On the other hand, principals and head contractors should aim to exclude the prevention principle where possible to preserve their right to claim liquidated damages, an essential remedy for enforcing contract completion dates.

Learn more here

Whether you are a developer, contractor, or subcontractor, a solid grasp of construction law and contracts will help you navigate the complexities of the construction industry.

For more information or assistance with construction law and contracts, contact one of our experienced construction lawyers today.

The content of this publication is intended to provide a summary and commentary only. It is not intended to be comprehensive nor does it constitute legal advice, and has been prepared based on applicable legislation and case authority at the date of publication. You should seek legal advice on specific circumstances before taking any action.